Another Billionaire Promoting Geoengineering Schemes
1 September 2026 | ZEROGeoengineering.com | Like Bill Gates, Elon Musk is a businessman, not a credible advocate for responsible environmental stewardship. Both billionaires have promoted hazardous geoengineering schemes based on unsubstantiated theories relative to global temperatures.[1][2][3] A simple fact that is missed by so many billionaires, yet widely understood by the working class, is that pollution is the biggest problem related to climate issues, not the sunlight.
Nevertheless, Mr. Musk, showing off an adolescent video-game mentality, is promoting the idea of using satellites and AI to control global temperature: “Space satellites to control temperature and massive geo-engineering will be needed or it will be game over.”
Musk is arguably one of the biggest polluters in the world, with toxic rocket emissions and RF RADIATION pollution from satellites.
Findings published in a 2024 study (below) by the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics on second generation V2-mini Starlink satellites found 32 times more radiation than the first generation. The authors characterize the electromagnetic radiation as “unintended,” as if radiation emissions are not inherent properties of the design.
Sources
[1] Does A Global Temperature Exist?https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259098600_Does_a_Global_Temperature_Exist
[ Full Text: https://zeronotification.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Does-Global-Temperature-Exist.pdf ]
“There is no global temperature. The reasons lie in the properties of the equation of state governing local thermodynamic equilibrium, and the implications cannot be avoided by substituting statistics for physics.”
[2] Whole Rubric of Global Temperature is a Fake and a Fraud https://rumble.com/v6udzwl-jonathan-cohler-whole-rubric-of-global-temperature-is-a-fake-and-a-fraud-to.html
[3] A Critical Reassessment of the Anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming Hypothesis: Empirical Evidence Contradicts IPCC Models and Solar Forcing Assumptions
https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Grok-3-Review-V6.pdf
“The anthropogenic CO₂-Global Warming hypothesis, as articulated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and supported by researchers such as Mann, Schmidt, and Hausfather, lacks robust empirical support when subjected to rigorous scrutiny. This analysis integrates unadjusted observational data and recent peer-reviewed studies to demonstrate that the assertion of human CO₂ emissions as the primary driver of climate variability since 1750 is not substantiated. Instead, natural processes—including temperature feedbacks, solar variability, and oceanic dynamics—provide a more consistent explanation for observed trends.”
Related
Bill Gates backs climate scientists lobbying for large-scale geoengineering
Satellite pollution creating ‘unregulated geoengineering experiment’
New Studies Confirm Reproductive Damage from RF Radiation Exposure