Metals in Wildfire Suppressants
29 April 2025 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | More scrutiny is needed regarding the widespread use of chemical fire retardants. Due to their toxicity, there is a ban on releasing these agents on waterways and endangered species habitats. PHOS-CHEK, the primary aerial retardant used in western wildfires, was developed in the early 1960s by Monsanto.
In California an independent investigation was conducted by reporters and USC researchers that analyzed samples of fire retardant collected after the Palisades, Eaton, and Franklin fires.
“Those tests found toxic heavy metals including lead, arsenic, cadmium and chromium, which can accumulate in the environment and pose risks to humans and wildlife, according to federal and state environmental agencies.”


Arsenic (As) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5359596 Acute Toxic, Environmental Hazard
Cadmium (Cd) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/23973 Flammable, Acute Toxic, Health Hazard, Environmental Hazard
Copper (Cu) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/23978 Environmental Hazard
Manganese (Mn) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Manganese Flammable, Irritant, Environmental Hazard
Nickel (Ci) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/935 Irritant, Health Hazard
Lead (Pb) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5352425 Health Hazard, Environmental Hazard
Antimony (Sb) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5354495 Acute Toxic, Irritant, Health Hazard, Environmental Hazard
Thallium (Tl) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/5359464 Acute Toxic, Health Hazard
Vanadium (V) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/23990#section=Hazard-Classes-and-Categories “Highly toxic, may be fatal if inhaled, ingested or absorbed through skin.”
Zinc (Zn) https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/23994 Flammable, Environmental Hazard
Metals in Wildfire Suppressants Marella H. Schammel, Samantha J. Gold, and Daniel L. McCurry Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2024 11 (11), 1247-1253 DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00727
In this study, metal concentrations in several fire suppression products (some approved by the U.S. Forest Service, and some marketed for consumer use) were quantified to evaluate whether these products could contribute to increased metal concentrations observed in the environment postfire. Long-term fire retardants contained concentrations of toxic metals (V, Cr, Mn, Cu, As, Cd, Sb, Ba, Tl, and Pb) 4–2,880 times greater than drinking water regulatory limits, and potentially greater than some aquatic toxicity thresholds when released into the environment.

Related
PHOS-CHEK brand belonged to the Monsanto Company until 1998
Nationwide Aerial Application of Fire Retardant on National Forest System Lands
Chemical Forest Fire Retardants: Acute Toxicity to Five Freshwater Fishes and a Scud
Wildland Fire Chemical Products Toxicity and Environmental Concerns General Information
NOAA Chemical Science Laboratory NASA FIREX-AQ
Articles
What’s in that bright red fire retardant? No one will say, so we had it tested
Wildfire retardant sprayed from planes can contaminate food and water
What’s in the Pink Flame Retardant Planes Are Dropping on the LA Fires?
We’re dumping loads of retardant chemicals to fight wildfires. What does it mean for wildlife?
