June 30, 2023 | ZeroGeoengineering.com | Geoengineering field “research” may be indistinguishable from deployment, although this fact is not mentioned in the June 2023 EU report, JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL.

The paper acknowledges that geoengineering “technologies introduce new risks to people and ecosystems, while they could also increase power imbalances between nations, spark conflicts and raises a myriad of ethical, legal, governance and political issues…the EU will support international efforts to assess comprehensively the risks and uncertainties of climate interventions, including solar radiation modification and promote discussions on a potential international framework for its governance, including research related aspects.”

Harmful effects of toxic agents contained in geoengineering aerosols such as SO2 have been positively established in scientific and medical literature. Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) and aluminum oxide (alumina) have negative health and environmental impacts, as also cited in Mexico’s ban on solar geoengineering.

Therefore, the appropriate policy regarding the intentional release of hazardous emissions via stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) and other methods of geoengineering is prohibition.

JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Link to Full Document: JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

To learn more about advocating for laws to prohibit weather modification, solar geoengineering, and other atmospheric/environmental hazards email: contact@americans4acleanatmosphere.com or director@zerogeoengineering.com.

Related

Geo-engineering: A roadmap toward international guidelines 

Geoengineering Parts I, II, and III

Geoengineering: Governance and Technology Policy

A Coordinated Strategy Could Focus Federal Geoengineering Research and Inform Governance Efforts

Preliminary Observations on Geoengineering Science, Federal Efforts, and Governance Issues

Weather and Climate Modification

Congressional Research Service – Geoengineering

Related:

FLASHBACK 2013: Harvard Professor Admits The Truth About Geoengineering

2013: Harvard professor David Keith stated, “This is a really important moral point. So if I made a decision or if there was a collective decision to do a geoengineering program, and you put say, the kind of program I think that makes more sense is what about a million tons a year [of sulfur dioxide], let’s say, you might end up killing many tens of thousands of people a year as a direct result of that decision…”