Climate engineering might be too risky — 1 Comment

  1. What strikes me in reading this article is that the people at IMPLICC use language that suggests they believe these solutions are prospective rather than current. There’s also no mention of the recorded toxic particles already having been, and continuing to be, dispensed in our atmosphere. The variable concerns they express seem oblivious to the idea that what has been sytematically and historically introduced would already complicate the ‘predicted’ balance they are hoping to achieve by means ‘unproven’, in their own words.